Shahryar Mohsenin is an assistant professor of Marketing at UTS Business School. He earned his PhD in Marketing, with a focus on Consumer Behavior, from Bocconi University, Italy.
His research focuses on consumer choice, judgment and decision-making, branding, and processing disfluency. Drawing on cognitive psychology, he primarily uses experimental methods, complemented by secondary data, to understand how consumers process information and make choices across different marketplace contexts. His research has been published in the Journal of Consumer Research (FT50/ABDC A*) and Psychological Science (FT50/ABDC A*). His current research examines topics in branding, including brand names and brand activism, as well as how the framing and presentation of price information shape consumer judgments and choices.
He is also a member of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) Consumer Behaviour Special Interest Group (CB-SIG).
Mohsenin, Shahryar and Kurt P. Munz (2026) , “How Perceptual Disfluency Affects Consumer Choices,” Journal of Consumer Research, 53 (3),535–559.
Abstract:
Marketing materials often create difficulties for consumers through elements like unconventional fonts or distracting background images, leading to perceptual disfluency—a sense of difficulty encoding information. During choices, consumers can mistake perceptual disfluency for choice difficulty, a feeling of indecision. Building on this idea, eleven preregistered experiments (N = 9,042) show that, when making choices, perceptual disfluency can lead consumers to rely on information that feels more intuitively appealing to them, such as a familiar brand, a preferred country of origin, or a recommendation, rather than on information they must carefully consider like numerical product specifications. Differing from the effect of perceptual disfluency in other situations, during choices, this effect occurs because consumers process information less deeply, engaging in relatively more intuitive and less analytical processing. This effect is amplified when consumers endorse a “fast-is-accurate” lay theory. In contrast, it does not occur when consumers do not mistake perceptual disfluency for choice difficulty, as when prompted to consider the actual reason for the disfluency, or when not making a choice.
Abstract:
Recently, gender-ambiguous (non-binary) voices have been added to voice assistants to combat gender stereotypes and foster inclusion. However, if people react negatively to such voices, these laudable efforts may be counterproductive. In five preregistered studies (N = 3,684) we find that people do react negatively, rating products described by narrators with gender-ambiguous voices less favorably than when they are described by clearly male or female narrators. This is due to the voices creating a feeling of unease related to difficulty understanding the gender of the narrator, what we call social disfluency, that spills over to affect evaluations of the products being described. These effects are best explained by low familiarity with voices that sound ambiguous. Thus, initial negative reactions can be overcome with more exposure.
Brand name abbreviation is common in the marketplace, appearing among both established brands (e.g., H&M, FedEx) and newer brands (e.g., GB, HVMN). Yet little is known about how consumers respond to this naming strategy. Across nine studies—including a Facebook field study, seven preregistered experiments, and an archival analysis of nearly 700 U.S. brands—we show that abbreviated brand names can reduce brand performance, including choice share, brand attitudes, engagement, and purchase intentions. This effect occurs because abbreviation weakens semantic associations by compressing or removing lexical cues that help consumers infer what a brand represents. Consistent with this account, the negative effects are attenuated or eliminated when prior familiarity allows consumers to retrieve established brand associations or when the abbreviation itself forms a meaningful word (e.g., C.A.R.E.). We also identify important boundary conditions in which reduced semantic associations become advantageous. When abbreviation obscures negative country-of-origin stereotypes, it reduces stereotype-driven penalties. Likewise, in embarrassing product categories, reduced semantic transparency lowers social discomfort, making abbreviated brand names more appealing. Together, these findings identify semantic association as a key mechanism through which brand name structure shapes consumer judgment and demonstrate when abbreviation helps versus hurts brand performance.
“Follow-Up Brand Activism: When Changing Causes Hurts Brands,” by Abas Mirzaei (Macquarie Business School), Shahryar Mohsenin, and Sepehr Safari (emlyon business school)
“Historical Price Fluctuation and Purchase Decision: The Role of Our Perception” By Shahryar Mohsenin, Kurt Munz (Bocconi University), and Hean Tat Keh (Monash University)